StoppingPower.net Forums
Home
Forums
Commentary
H&S
About
StoppingPower.net Forums

StoppingPower.net Forums - Uses lasers ?
StoppingPower.net Forums
StoppingPower.net Forums
Forums Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Invite a friend
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Shooting
 Pistol Palace
 Uses lasers ?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Arvinator
Advanced Member

USA
5252 Posts

Posted - April 30 2017 :  4:39:30 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Not asked anyone but I was asked. Lasers? If used as a close range, quick/rapid use but STILL train the majority of the time with sights. Yes? No? what say you?

I'll admit I'm a fan, but only after at least all of my daylight shooting and 2/3 of my low light shooting I use the sights. I know batteries can fail on me so I train like they are not there, then shoot a mix of sights and/or laser in lower light. I do like the Crimson Trace grips I have on a few of my pistols.

Be honest, fair, and always prepared...

LittleBill
Advanced Member

4377 Posts

Posted - April 30 2017 :  5:22:49 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
What I've wondered about lasers: is training with a laser fundamentally different from training with sights?

Is it the case that you can either train yourself to look for the laser, or to look for your front sight--- but not both?

And that if you do train for both, that that could conceivably lead to confusion/vascillation at the critical moment? Which do I look for: the laser or the front sight?

Considering how our brains and bodies react under conditions of life-threatening stress: does it make sense to train on one 'system' only?

I like using the Crimson Trace laser to train my 'muscle memory' for point shooting: training my eyes/body/brain to learn/see where the gun is pointing.


"Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at its testing point"--- C.S. Lewis

"There are some ideas so foolish that only an intellectual could believe them"--- George Orwell

Slow Is Smooth, Smooth Is Fast

Edited by - LittleBill on April 30 2017 6:31:33 PM
Go to Top of Page

Arvinator
Advanced Member

USA
5252 Posts

Posted - April 30 2017 :  6:57:03 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
For near distances and to get shots off quick, I never get a sight picture. When from different positions such as if I fall, or get down and do a off side/ weak hand shot I tend to much better with the laser than the sights when trying to be both fast and accurate. It also lets my range partner see how bad any "Wobble" may be when firing.

Be honest, fair, and always prepared...
Go to Top of Page

Ace
Advanced Member

USA
5049 Posts

Posted - April 30 2017 :  9:05:43 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
My experience with virtually every student who shows up with a laser is that they tend to get confused if the laser doesn't come on--dead battery, forgot to turn it on, finger blocking the beam (easy to do with the grip-mounted Crimson Trace), whatever. Their next step is to start figuring out why the dot isn't on the target, rather than getting the sight on target and shooting.
Training and experience can alleviate the problem, but sadly a lot of carriers don't really train or practice much. Personally I'm not a fan, then again I'm not really dead-set against them either. It's like changing from a revolver to a semiauto, or a 1911 to a Glock---they work differently, and you are responsible for learning the difference before trusting your life to them.

Then, all that said, I've never tried one on a rifle. I can imagine them being good in some rifle uses---if it's turned on, the battery is alive, dirt or blood or other gunk hasn't blocked the beam, etc. Ace

Give me $1 every time a Liberal lies, I'll give you $5 every time one tells the truth; I'll end up a wealthy man, you'll end up broke.
Go to Top of Page

Dov
Advanced Member

USA
2638 Posts

Posted - April 30 2017 :  11:21:11 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I really like laser grips, especially on J frames.

Makes sight radius of irons mute, gives a functional sight radius of range to target. .

I plan to have lasers of some sort on all my serious handguns eventually, just a budget issue or I'd have done it already.

If I lose my glasses in a fight, or don't have them on (sleeping/shower/etc) I can see target to ID it and laser dot but making out Sights with any speed is not happening.

I also find them better than live fire for DA revolver dryfire though YMMV. Umm that might not be clearly worded, I've learned things about DA Trigger control from dryfire with laser I'd never have learned with live fire.

Because I got to see the difference in patterns of movement and how finger placement, grip changes, and cadence impacted it.

With some guns like J frames I use Laser as primary Sights, it's faster & more precise, Plan B is using Front Sight like shotgun bead.

I also think laser on AR with right setup might address high sightline issues with AR's at close range.

Edited by - Dov on April 30 2017 11:25:11 PM
Go to Top of Page

LittleBill
Advanced Member

4377 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  07:42:45 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Our brains operate differently when under extreme stress. Our thought processes are 'short-circuited': we automatically and unthinkingly revert to what we've practiced the most.

But what if we've practiced two different and opposing reactions: 'find my front sight' and 'find the laser dot'?

Under normal, unstressed operation, it's easy enough to quickly choose one or the other. Under the extreme stress of an unexpected gunfight, maybe not... will we find ourselves instinctively looking for the dot in a situation where we'd be better served by looking for the front sight?

Especially since the laser is the 'easier' of the two to use; are we inadvertantly training ourselves to 'prefer' the laser; even in situations where the front sight would be better?

I don't think anyone here is advocating only relying on the laser, since there are times we'll need our sights.

But to the extent that we practice with the laser, are we potentially setting ourselves up for a fall?

I'm just posing the questions, don't presume to know the answers....

"Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at its testing point"--- C.S. Lewis

"There are some ideas so foolish that only an intellectual could believe them"--- George Orwell

Slow Is Smooth, Smooth Is Fast

Edited by - LittleBill on May 01 2017 09:01:52 AM
Go to Top of Page

Pop Pop
Senior Member

USA
687 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  08:08:10 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I only turn my laser on in low light conditions. I don't prefer them, if I can see the iron sights. I have one on my bedside drawer revolver.

Pop Pop
Go to Top of Page

djwarner
Junior Member

USA
234 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  09:08:20 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I shoot left handed but I am right eye dominant. This becomes a problem in a fast draw situation with both eyes open. The laser sight alerts to the misalignment before pulling the trigger. As a pilot, I've learned to trust my instruments and thus train to rely in the laser in that moment of confusion.

I've used both red and green lasers and much prefer the green laser for its visibility in daylight.

NON NOBIS TANTUM NATI
Go to Top of Page

Uncle Mike
Advanced Member

USA
1605 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  10:07:03 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi, I don't own a laser. I have been told that in a combat situation the shooter loses time by positioning the dot. This I believe can be corrected through training. I have shot a highly tuned Beretta 92 and found that the dot shake was disconcerting. I know they are popular but they just don't work for me, regards, Mike

"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage"...Thucyides

"War is sweet to those who do not know it."...Erasmus
Go to Top of Page

Chris Christian
Advanced Member

USA
2939 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  10:23:28 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'm a fan of the instinctive activation Crimson Trace lasers for certain specific uses. For me, the primary use is in home defense. I have one on the GP-100 parked on my night stand.

If I have to jump out of bed suddenly in the middle of the night I may not have time to find my eye glasses... or grab the flashlight next to the revolver. That makes iron sights pretty useless for me in that situation. The laser is bright enough under those dark conditions to throw some light off of my white walls. It will show me a target at in-home distances. To turn it on I grip the revolver firmly. To turn it off I loosen my grip. It's pretty simple in that role and is an excellent tool.

I have played with various lasers quite a bit. I have found them (even the green ones) to be virtually useless outdoors in daylight, under even heavily overcast conditions and short range. I'll stick with irons. However, they work well in any indoor situation... even in a box store with big windows and bright lights... and for extensive (over 20 yard) distances. I could see some use for them in a security application of that type.

As for getting comfortable with them, it ... like anything else... requires some practice. BUT... in a threat situation it has been pretty much proven that the eye is naturally drawn to the threat. If one presents the weapon properly, that dot will be where the eyes are naturally drawn to.

I consider the right laser to be a useful 'accessory' tool for certain applications... and use them myself in those roles.

Chris Christian
There are those who make things happen. There are those who watch things happen. There are those who wonder What The Heck happened! Pick one.
Go to Top of Page

Jim Higginbotham
Moderator

USA
9431 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  10:40:14 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
One agency I used to train started out with about 50% of their officers carrying CT lasers on their Glocks.

This was active shooter training and we spent one day on the range and one in the Live Fire Shoot House.

After watching their AAR videos they asked questions like "Why does my hand glow red?" - well you had the laser on (and the trigger finger was appropriately straight). "Oh no I didn't, I made sure not to squeeze hard when searching" (obviously not!).

The other was "What is that red dot that shows in the room before I come through the door".

My fellow instructor, always the wit, told them that was the "red bug of death" that precedes officers when entering a room and lets the bad guy know what is behind it.

It took a year for the everyone in the department to cycle through (we only did 8-12 per class so they would not have to leave the streets unprotected). The second year the only lasers were the few that had one on their flashlight and those typically were turned off.

I find a laser useful for shooting vermin at night but I use it in conjunction with a light so I have good target ID - and RDS would (and does) work just as well.

I have a laser on my hide out gun (more of an experiment than anything). One day the son and I were on the range and we decided to try some Pepper Poppers at 10 yards with this DAO snubby.

We figured that if there is an advantage it would happen at further rather than closer range.

For both of us the first round hit took twice as long from the low ready as when using the iron sights - I'd point out that I don't use it much and he never uses one so it might be a "learning curve" thing. I should point out that this is daylight! One should probably experiment in dim light as well.

I could see one being useful for a home defense thing where you "fort up" and don't go searching.

Like Chris, I'm only interested in the ones that come on with a grip, not having to flip a switch or a paddle - but I also would not have one that did not have an off switch (well OK I do have one without a switch on a Glock 17 but that is not something I'd carry).

As with anything and everything, you have to work out your own salvation - get one and go test it to see if you are actually better with it!

Jim

Get the Weaponcraft Journal on Amazon: Print or Kindle!
Go to Top of Page

hopleyyeaton
Junior Member

USA
104 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  11:11:03 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Uncle Mike

Hi, I don't own a laser. I have been told that in a combat situation the shooter loses time by positioning the dot. This I believe can be corrected through training. I have shot a highly tuned Beretta 92 and found that the dot shake was disconcerting. I know they are popular but they just don't work for me, regards, Mike


When I first put a red dot on my bullseye gun scores actually dropped for a while until I got coached to accept the natural wobble. Where iron sights seemed rock steady the dot was dancing around the bull like a moth around the porch light. I've not used a laser but I can imagine it to be similar, and something to get used to. Let the dot dance, concentrate on trigger control, and trust that the dot is spending most of the time in the bullseye.
Go to Top of Page

Chris Christian
Advanced Member

USA
2939 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  11:52:01 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
All too often we see people embracing the "latest gizmo syndrome" (LGS). Those so afflicted feel that since they have the "Latest Gizmo" they are totally Good-To-Go and why bother with range time now... technology is my salvation!

It's a fallacy that gets people killed. The most bulging checkbook in the world won't save someone who doesn't take the time to learn the tool. And, that's all lasers (and red dot sights) are -- tools to perform a task.

I left bullseye competition before red dots became popular. But I have three red dot sights on current competition guns that I shoot in USPSA/Steel Challenge. Back when I had functioning eyes I could run the tougher Steel Challenge stages (10 & 12 inch round plates at 10-20 yards and spread in a 75 degree arc) with an iron-sighted 9mm... starting with my wrists above the shoulders in the Surrender Position and drawing at the beep... in the 4.5 second range. I can't see iron sights that well any more so I have a red dot on a virtually identical gun.

I'm now doing it in the 3.8 second range... and I'm five years older.

That single point red dot aiming system is no different than a projected laser.Does it bounce more than the iron sight picture I used to think was rock steady? Of course. Does it bounce enough to keep me from being faster and more accurate? Nope.

Did it come to me magically overnight? Nope. I had to practice. Did that pay off? Yep!

In the example Jim cited above about officers with (admittedly) minimal training... it illustrates LGS. Tools are great... but training is required. My guess is that if they understood their "Latest Gizmo" and spent more time with it, they wouldn't have 'red hands' and be confused about 'dots on the wall'.

Just ramblin'.. YMMV

Chris Christian
There are those who make things happen. There are those who watch things happen. There are those who wonder What The Heck happened! Pick one.
Go to Top of Page

LittleBill
Advanced Member

4377 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  4:39:39 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I've not used the newest generation of Crimson Trace lasers, with a pressure pad on the front of the grip, as opposed to the older version with the pressure switch on the side; but several reviewers have complained that (for them) it takes an un-naturally-tight squeeze to activate the newer version.

I've got a green older version of the CT on my bedside Sig. I like it as a training device to fine-tune my pointing skills.


"Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at its testing point"--- C.S. Lewis

"There are some ideas so foolish that only an intellectual could believe them"--- George Orwell

Slow Is Smooth, Smooth Is Fast

Edited by - LittleBill on May 01 2017 5:14:36 PM
Go to Top of Page

LittleBill
Advanced Member

4377 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  4:55:48 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Christian

All too often we see people embracing the "latest gizmo syndrome" (LGS). Those so afflicted feel that since they have the "Latest Gizmo" they are totally Good-To-Go and why bother with range time now... technology is my salvation!

It's a fallacy that gets people killed. The most bulging checkbook in the world won't save someone who doesn't take the time to learn the tool. And, that's all lasers (and red dot sights) are -- tools to perform a task.

I left bullseye competition before red dots became popular. But I have three red dot sights on current competition guns that I shoot in USPSA/Steel Challenge. Back when I had functioning eyes I could run the tougher Steel Challenge stages (10 & 12 inch round plates at 10-20 yards and spread in a 75 degree arc) with an iron-sighted 9mm... starting with my wrists above the shoulders in the Surrender Position and drawing at the beep... in the 4.5 second range. I can't see iron sights that well any more so I have a red dot on a virtually identical gun.

I'm now doing it in the 3.8 second range... and I'm five years older.

That single point red dot aiming system is no different than a projected laser.Does it bounce more than the iron sight picture I used to think was rock steady? Of course. Does it bounce enough to keep me from being faster and more accurate? Nope.

Did it come to me magically overnight? Nope. I had to practice. Did that pay off? Yep!

In the example Jim cited above about officers with (admittedly) minimal training... it illustrates LGS. Tools are great... but training is required. My guess is that if they understood their "Latest Gizmo" and spent more time with it, they wouldn't have 'red hands' and be confused about 'dots on the wall'.

Just ramblin'.. YMMV


Good points! I'm sure we all appreciate being able to benefit from your experience, Chris, I know I do. Like Jim's ramblin', yours always seems to lead somewhere worthwhile.

One difference between the red dot on your weapon-mounted sight, and the red dot projected by a laser, is that the red dot in the sight doesn't vary in brightness--- while the projected laser dot can tend to 'disappear' at distance, in daylight, or against a red garment.


"Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at its testing point"--- C.S. Lewis

"There are some ideas so foolish that only an intellectual could believe them"--- George Orwell

Slow Is Smooth, Smooth Is Fast

Edited by - LittleBill on May 01 2017 5:01:25 PM
Go to Top of Page

LittleBill
Advanced Member

4377 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  5:00:37 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Christian

I'm a fan of the instinctive activation Crimson Trace lasers for certain specific uses. For me, the primary use is in home defense. I have one on the GP-100 parked on my night stand.

If I have to jump out of bed suddenly in the middle of the night I may not have time to find my eye glasses... or grab the flashlight next to the revolver. That makes iron sights pretty useless for me in that situation. The laser is bright enough under those dark conditions to throw some light off of my white walls. It will show me a target at in-home distances. To turn it on I grip the revolver firmly. To turn it off I loosen my grip. It's pretty simple in that role and is an excellent tool.

I have played with various lasers quite a bit. I have found them (even the green ones) to be virtually useless outdoors in daylight, under even heavily overcast conditions and short range. I'll stick with irons. However, they work well in any indoor situation... even in a box store with big windows and bright lights... and for extensive (over 20 yard) distances. I could see some use for them in a security application of that type.

As for getting comfortable with them, it ... like anything else... requires some practice. BUT... in a threat situation it has been pretty much proven that the eye is naturally drawn to the threat. If one presents the weapon properly, that dot will be where the eyes are naturally drawn to.

I consider the right laser to be a useful 'accessory' tool for certain applications... and use them myself in those roles.


So would it be fair to conclude that in your experience, the laser is a great solution on a bedside gun--- where lighting conditions can be counted on to be consistently predictable, and the laser illumines the threat as well as serves as an aiming device--- and good in pretty much any indoor situation--- but that it isn't to be relied on in the 'outside world'--- where lighting conditions can render it inoperative?

I guess my worry would be that after spending time training with the laser, I'd find myself searching for that laser dot in an outside situation, rather than looking for my front sight.... then again, you've trained much more than I have, so YMMV in that regard...

I too wear glasses, and see very poorly without 'em; but the Big Dot tritium front sight on my bedside Sig is plenty visible even without my specs.


"Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at its testing point"--- C.S. Lewis

"There are some ideas so foolish that only an intellectual could believe them"--- George Orwell

Slow Is Smooth, Smooth Is Fast

Edited by - LittleBill on May 01 2017 5:46:13 PM
Go to Top of Page

Chris Christian
Advanced Member

USA
2939 Posts

Posted - May 01 2017 :  5:50:21 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by LittleBill

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Christian

I'm a fan of the instinctive activation Crimson Trace lasers for certain specific uses. For me, the primary use is in home defense. I have one on the GP-100 parked on my night stand.

If I have to jump out of bed suddenly in the middle of the night I may not have time to find my eye glasses... or grab the flashlight next to the revolver. That makes iron sights pretty useless for me in that situation. The laser is bright enough under those dark conditions to throw some light off of my white walls. It will show me a target at in-home distances. To turn it on I grip the revolver firmly. To turn it off I loosen my grip. It's pretty simple in that role and is an excellent tool.

I have played with various lasers quite a bit. I have found them (even the green ones) to be virtually useless outdoors in daylight, under even heavily overcast conditions and short range. I'll stick with irons. However, they work well in any indoor situation... even in a box store with big windows and bright lights... and for extensive (over 20 yard) distances. I could see some use for them in a security application of that type.

As for getting comfortable with them, it ... like anything else... requires some practice. BUT... in a threat situation it has been pretty much proven that the eye is naturally drawn to the threat. If one presents the weapon properly, that dot will be where the eyes are naturally drawn to.

I consider the right laser to be a useful 'accessory' tool for certain applications... and use them myself in those roles.


So would it be fair to conclude that in your experience, the laser is a great solution on a bedside gun--- where lighting conditions can be counted on to be consistently predictable, and the laser illumines the threat as well as serves as an aiming device--- and good in pretty much any indoor situation--- but that it isn't to be relied on in the 'outside world'--- where lighting conditions can render it inoperative?

I guess my worry would be that after spending time training with the laser, I'd find myself searching for that laser dot in an outside situation.... of course, you've trained much more than I have, so YMMV...

I too wear glasses, and see very poorly without 'em; but the Big Dot tritium front sight on my bedside Sig is plenty visible even without my specs.





Indoors yes. Any indoor situation. Outdoors, no. Go to iron sights. Don't hunt for the 'dot'. A Big Dot tritium is a very nice 'night stand pistol tool'. At those ranges it's really all you need to see. But it won't help 'light up the room' like a big laser will. You'll see the silhouette of the perp and put the big dot on it. The laser will let you see if he's smiling while you double tap him.

Chris Christian
There are those who make things happen. There are those who watch things happen. There are those who wonder What The Heck happened! Pick one.
Go to Top of Page

Jim Higginbotham
Moderator

USA
9431 Posts

Posted - May 02 2017 :  07:34:13 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by hopleyyeaton

quote:
Originally posted by Uncle Mike

Hi, I don't own a laser. I have been told that in a combat situation the shooter loses time by positioning the dot. This I believe can be corrected through training. I have shot a highly tuned Beretta 92 and found that the dot shake was disconcerting. I know they are popular but they just don't work for me, regards, Mike


When I first put a red dot on my bullseye gun scores actually dropped for a while until I got coached to accept the natural wobble. Where iron sights seemed rock steady the dot was dancing around the bull like a moth around the porch light. I've not used a laser but I can imagine it to be similar, and something to get used to. Let the dot dance, concentrate on trigger control, and trust that the dot is spending most of the time in the bullseye.



Yes Sir, the wobble is apparent. One thing for sure that I forgot to mention - lasers are great for teaching trigger control!

Jim

Get the Weaponcraft Journal on Amazon: Print or Kindle!
Go to Top of Page

Chris Christian
Advanced Member

USA
2939 Posts

Posted - May 02 2017 :  3:46:19 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
They will... if used under the appropriate lighting condition (indoor ranges)darned sure show wobble.. and sloppy trigger jerks.

But LGS is no real solution to 'lack of training'. But, give one to a trained shooter and... under the right conditions... they will be more effective.

Match the tool to the task, and train. LGS will not solve a lack of training.

Chris Christian
There are those who make things happen. There are those who watch things happen. There are those who wonder What The Heck happened! Pick one.
Go to Top of Page

BobM77
Advanced Member

USA
1425 Posts

Posted - May 03 2017 :  11:30:00 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I've thought it might be a benefit to a person with poorer vision. For example, homeowner awakened by sounds of ab intrusion grabs the pistol but not his eyeglasses.
Go to Top of Page

Jim Higginbotham
Moderator

USA
9431 Posts

Posted - May 05 2017 :  11:58:27 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BobM77

I've thought it might be a benefit to a person with poorer vision. For example, homeowner awakened by sounds of ab intrusion grabs the pistol but not his eyeglasses.



I think that might be true - OTOH, the ranges in self defense are normally pretty close and precise sight alignment is not as critical as at longer ranges.

Jim

Get the Weaponcraft Journal on Amazon: Print or Kindle!
Go to Top of Page

jle3030
Advanced Member

USA
4992 Posts

Posted - May 05 2017 :  12:51:47 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Is this uninformed person getting that in a the dark the laser can put out enough scatter light to act as a bullet magnet?

Jeff

jle3030
Go to Top of Page

Chris Christian
Advanced Member

USA
2939 Posts

Posted - May 05 2017 :  2:37:50 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jle3030

Is this uninformed person getting that in a the dark the laser can put out enough scatter light to act as a bullet magnet?

Jeff



I'm confused. Which 'uninformed person' are you speaking of. If the target is visually acquired... by silhouette or whatever... and the gun is presented... and the grip tightened to activate that laser... then the scatter light from the laser... IMHO... is a non-factor because the TIQ (Target In Question)should already be hit, at least twice, and repeat if needed.

Bullet magnet? Yes, if you flash it around like some sorta Star Wars light sabre. But, in real terms, that 'scatter light' is a lot less of a bullet magnet than a flashlight held next to the gun.

I'm confused. Please educate me on this

Chris Christian
There are those who make things happen. There are those who watch things happen. There are those who wonder What The Heck happened! Pick one.
Go to Top of Page

jle3030
Advanced Member

USA
4992 Posts

Posted - May 06 2017 :  07:44:19 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Christian

quote:
Originally posted by jle3030

Is this uninformed person getting that in a the dark the laser can put out enough scatter light to act as a bullet magnet?

Jeff



I'm confused. Which 'uninformed person' are you speaking of. If the target is visually acquired... by silhouette or whatever... and the gun is presented... and the grip tightened to activate that laser... then the scatter light from the laser... IMHO... is a non-factor because the TIQ (Target In Question)should already be hit, at least twice, and repeat if needed.

Bullet magnet? Yes, if you flash it around like some sorta Star Wars light sabre. But, in real terms, that 'scatter light' is a lot less of a bullet magnet than a flashlight held next to the gun.

I'm confused. Please educate me on this

The uninformed person in question would be me. I have a couple guns with dimming night sights and am considering an upgrade to either lasers or red dot optics. I'm just trying to weigh the pros and cons.

Much thanks for your informed opinion

Jeff

jle3030
Go to Top of Page

Chris Christian
Advanced Member

USA
2939 Posts

Posted - May 06 2017 :  08:48:25 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks for that info. I have a better understanding now. A red dot optic would, IMHO, be a poor choice for "dim light home defense". They can bloom and fade erratically in varying light levels. I have to change brightness settings routinely between dimly-lite indoor ranges and bright outdoor ranges, and that takes time. Those reflex sights without an adjustable brightness feature are very difficult for me to use indoors.

My first choice is the instinctive activation laser. Second choice would be replacing the front night sight. At close range you really only need the front sight anyway. The faster you can find it the better off you are. That, or the laser, will be the fastest way to get on target, and in that situation speed is critical.

I hope that helps.

Chris Christian
There are those who make things happen. There are those who watch things happen. There are those who wonder What The Heck happened! Pick one.
Go to Top of Page

jle3030
Advanced Member

USA
4992 Posts

Posted - May 06 2017 :  10:00:19 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Christian

Thanks for that info. I have a better understanding now. A red dot optic would, IMHO, be a poor choice for "dim light home defense". They can bloom and fade erratically in varying light levels. I have to change brightness settings routinely between dimly-lite indoor ranges and bright outdoor ranges, and that takes time. Those reflex sights without an adjustable brightness feature are very difficult for me to use indoors.

My first choice is the instinctive activation laser. Second choice would be replacing the front night sight. At close range you really only need the front sight anyway. The faster you can find it the better off you are. That, or the laser, will be the fastest way to get on target, and in that situation speed is critical.

I hope that helps.

Thanks. That helps a lot.

Jeff

jle3030
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
StoppingPower.net Forums © 2002-16 StoppingPower.net, Inc. Go To Top Of Page
Thispagewasgeneratedin0.33seconds. Snitz Forums 2000